Revealing Medical Negligence: A Legal Perspective on Brain Surgery, MDTs and the Montgomery Dilemma

By Professor Charles Davis, Consultant Neurosurgeon & Honorary Clinical Professor of Neurosurgery & Oncology

Posted 20 December 2023

5 Minute Read

brain surgery, two doctors, INNEG

Tags:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Neurosurgery Litigation
  • Brain Trauma
  • Claim Lifecycle

Expert Disciplines:

  • Neurosurgery

About The Author

Professor Charles Davis

Consultant Neurosurgeon & Honorary Clinical Professor of Neurosurgery & Oncology

Professor Charles Davis is a Consultant Neurosurgeon and Honorary Clinical Professor of Neurosurgery & Oncology with over 30 years’ expert witness experience. He pioneered the UK’s first Neuro-Oncology Service and has authored 100+ publications. Specialising in neurosurgery claims, particularly neuro-oncology, he provides expert medico-legal insights in clinical negligence and personal injury cases.

From the Blog

Related Articles

brain-tumor-INNEG-solicitor-medicolegal.jpg
Blog10 min read

Gain expert insights on how delayed brain tumour diagnoses can impact outcomes, liability, and causation - essential reading for clinical negligence solicitors handling complex neurological claims.

cavernoma-brain-injury-INNEG-Medicolegal.jpg
Blog6 min read

Explore the diagnostic grey areas and treatment controversies of brain cavernomas - vital knowledge for assessing breach, causation, and defensibility in neurosurgical claims.

mri-scan-traumatic-brain-injury-epilepsy
Blog6 min read

Gain expert insight into assessing post-traumatic seizure risk in head injury claims - vital for accurate prognosis, liability, and compensation in clinical negligence cases.

Request a callback, or contact us.

Thank you for your request!

We will get back to you as soon as possible.

Why MDTs aren’t foolproof in clinical negligence claims