Watch the full session for practical insight into TIA, thrombolysis, thrombectomy, atrial fibrillation, hypertension and the key causation questions that can arise in stroke negligence claims.

This article examines the key medico-legal issues around diagnostic delay, treatment windows, stroke prevention and causation, drawing on Dr Kayvan Khadjooi’s clinical and expert witness experience.

For solicitors reviewing potential paediatric bone and joint infection claims, the focus is rarely just whether antibiotics were given. The more important questions are whether infection was considered early enough, whether imaging and microbiological investigations were adequate, whether surgery addressed the true extent of disease, and whether follow-up accounted for growth, function and long-term harm.

Drawing directly from his recent INNEG webinar, Consultant Paediatric Neurologist, with almost 20 years medico-legal experience, Dr Aniraban Majumdar shares 10 insights for solicitors dealing with complex paediatric neurological and birth injury claims.

One of the most important points for solicitors dealing with birth injury claims is that an early MRI scan cannot necessarily answer every question about a child's future.

When does a patient’s refusal of treatment reflect genuine capacity - and when is anorexia nervosa driving the decision?

A clear delay does not always mean a viable claim - this guide shows solicitors where causation can succeed or fall apart.

How should solicitors assess causation when a cancer patient survives, but is left facing more aggressive treatment, lasting complications and an increased future risk because of a negligent delay or error?

A practical guide for solicitors on assessing breach, causation and neurological outcome in cauda equina syndrome and spinal cord compression claims.

Could a capacity assessment be fundamentally flawed even when the individual appears to understand every question? In cases involving ASD, ADHD or intellectual disability, the answer may be yes.

When a skin cancer diagnosis is delayed, can you prove that earlier treatment would actually have changed the outcome?

Could the obvious expert in your drug injury claim be unable to answer the causation question that matters most?

Could a client’s post-operative voice change point to more than a recognised complication - and what evidence should you examine before deciding?

Rather than summarising neuropsychology theory, this guide focuses on the issues solicitors encounter most often when handling serious injury and clinical negligence claims.

Could a missed coeliac diagnosis, a contaminated meal or a workplace catering issue become your next claim?