When a complex birth injury claim requires specialist evidence, how quickly can you identify an expert whose experience genuinely matches the allegations?

Your expert is no longer available, but the instruction still needs to progress. How quickly can you find a suitable replacement?

Your client received antibiotics for sepsis but was their worsening condition recognised and acted on?

Could an early prognosis in a peripheral nerve injury claim lead to the case being significantly undervalued?

Alcohol use disorder can create complex clinical challenges, particularly when patients are admitted to hospital with intoxication, withdrawal symptoms or unexplained neurological deterioration.

Alcohol withdrawal and Wernicke's encephalopathy can present significant clinical risks when assessment, treatment or escalation is delayed.

This article explores why recovery after hand and wrist injury may be slower than expected, when further surgery or additional specialist input may help, and how those factors can shape causation, prognosis and quantum in a PI claim.

For solicitors reviewing potential negligence claims, the key questions often centre on whether deterioration was recognised, whether the patient was reassessed and whether treatment or escalation happened at the right time.

Sepsis negligence claims rarely turn on a single observation or decision. More often, the issues develop across the first 24–72 hours of care: a change in observations, an abnormal blood result, a failure to reassess, an incorrect working diagnosis or an escalation that happened too late.

See how INNEG helped a solicitor move from initial enquiry to confirmed Gynaecology expert instruction in just three days.

Where can an apparently straightforward stroke claim hide a missed opportunity to diagnose, treat or even prevent the eventual injury?

Watch the full session for practical insight into TIA, thrombolysis, thrombectomy, atrial fibrillation, hypertension and the key causation questions that can arise in stroke negligence claims.

This article examines the key medico-legal issues around diagnostic delay, treatment windows, stroke prevention and causation, drawing on Dr Kayvan Khadjooi’s clinical and expert witness experience.

For solicitors reviewing potential paediatric bone and joint infection claims, the focus is rarely just whether antibiotics were given. The more important questions are whether infection was considered early enough, whether imaging and microbiological investigations were adequate, whether surgery addressed the true extent of disease, and whether follow-up accounted for growth, function and long-term harm.

Drawing directly from his recent INNEG webinar, Consultant Paediatric Neurologist, with almost 20 years medico-legal experience, Dr Aniraban Majumdar shares 10 insights for solicitors dealing with complex paediatric neurological and birth injury claims.