In this webinar, Professor Bisdas explains why neuro-oncology imaging should be assessed in its real-world clinical context, rather than against an idealised textbook standard.

Neuro-oncology litigation often turns on what imaging showed, what should reasonably have been identified, and how those findings influenced clinical decision-making.

Dr Anna Kwartz explains the common breach of duty issues in optometry claims, from missed retinal detachments and glaucoma to the importance of digital imaging and complete clinical records.

This case shows how early, targeted expert strategy can prevent unnecessary overlap, reduce evidential complexity, and help solicitors focus on the issues most likely to determine breach, causation and valuation.

This eBook helps solicitors identify where hand and wrist injury claims are commonly undervalued, and how expert evidence can reveal the true functional, psychological, and financial impact of the injury.

Shoulder dystocia is one of the most urgent and distressing emergencies in maternity care. In birth injury claims, the key medico-legal questions often centre on risk recognition, timely escalation, correct manoeuvres, and the quality of the documentation.

A practical medico-legal overview of shoulder dystocia claims, focusing on antenatal risk factors, emergency management, documentation, and the key issues solicitors should consider.

When a solicitor anticipated needing both a Consultant Neurologist and Neurophysiologist, INNEG identified a single specialist able to address both issues within one coherent expert opinion.

For solicitors reviewing potential paediatric bone sarcoma claims, the challenge is often not whether the diagnosis was obvious at the first presentation, but whether persistent or progressive symptoms were recognised, investigated and referred appropriately as the clinical picture evolved.

This guide explores the medico-legal issues that most often determine liability in hypoxia-related birth injury claims, including timing disputes, CTG interpretation, antenatal compromise, and the evidential weaknesses that frequently undermine otherwise strong cases.

Hand and wrist injuries can have a significant impact on daily function, employment, and long-term quality of life - even where the initial injury appears relatively minor.

Hand and wrist injuries are frequently underestimated in personal injury litigation. While some fractures and soft tissue injuries may initially appear straightforward, the long-term impact on function, employment, hobbies and quality of life can be profound.

Spinal-surgery claims are often high-value, fact-intensive, and technically demanding. For solicitors, the key question is not always whether the outcome was bad, but whether the clinical decision-making threshold and timing pathway were consistent with current evidence and guidelines.

Birth injury claims involving hypoxia remain some of the most complex and high-value cases in clinical negligence. Understanding timing, causation, and the role of obstetric evidence is critical for building or defending a claim.

Birth injury claims involving hypoxia require careful analysis of clinical evidence, timelines, and decision-making. For solicitors, distinguishing when an injury occurred - and whether it was preventable - is often central to both breach and causation.